• EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is a neat idea until you’re in a situation where you remember 38 different words for a thing, just not the one in the language you need

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        9 days ago

        I only speak one language fluently and one language extremely poorly.

        The number of times I’ve been able to come up with the word I want in my second language and completely blanked on it in my native language baffles my mind.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 days ago

      If I could ‘cheat’ and say ‘I know every language in the world’, and that included programming languages and things like scientific notation as a language, I’d take that in a heartbeat. If not, I’d take programming, as at least then I can create things and make money.

      If speaking every language included dead and forgotten languages too though, then it would be a very tough choice.

      • shrodes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        This is probably super pedantic (bloody programmers right?) but I really feel like it would depend on what is meant by “know every programming language”. Like being able to remember every syntax and construct is sort of useful but not all that practical. Understanding how to implement the language in a useful way is the valuable part, not just knowing the keywords.

        I guess I would kind of compare it to the difference between being able to read Shakespeare and being able to write Shakespeare,

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Correct. Learning a programming language is trivial. Far easier than a foreign language.

          If we think of it in terms of learning a language, what matters is the grammar and ability to use it to struct prose to create a coherent story.

          There’s also a lot of reuse which requires knowing what’s available. The closest analogy there is how music sampling is used.

        • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          If we’re being pedantic, in The Matrix, Neo says ‘I know kung fu’ to explain that he both knows what all the moves are, and how to use them. As that was the topic of the post, I used the same sentence structure to mean the same thing about all languages, including programming 😉

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’d make tens of dollars as the scholar to decode the Harrapan/Indus Valley script!

      Or I make makes millions as a YouTuber decoding the Voynich manuscript…

      Our society is broken:(

    • niktemadur@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      If it was just one language and writing system as a choice, I might say Japanese.

      There are so many different characters in their writing as symbols instead of phonetic sounds, that bookstores in Japan are divided into sections, in which one has books that use… say 500 characters, then another section with books that use 1200 characters, or 5000, or 10,000, or more!
      To read Japanese or Chinese with a mastery of over 10,000 symbols might be my choice. The richness and depth of those writings must be something incredible.

      My second choice, for shits ‘n’ giggles, might be something like Sumerian or Akkadian, in the original Cuneiform!

    • adam_y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      I can’t even imagine how powerful I would be if I could be ignored in every language.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is a back up power to me. The best power is the power to control time however you like.

      You could learn every language ever created with the ability to control time. As you would also live as long as you wanted.

      You also would be able to timelock any object making it unmoving and indestructable.

      You can heal anyone from anything by rolling them back to when they werent injured

      No end to what you can do with controlling time

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        You also would be able to timelock any object making it unmoving and indestructable.

        Technically, if you stop something in time and space, it would disappear before your very eyes if it was on Earth, as the Earth would keep on going on its orbit around the sun, around the Milky Way Galaxy, etc. and your object would be floating somewhere. Against what reference point would you lock it?

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Against what reference point would you lock it?

          Depends on what you need it to do (or not do)

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        I might be a little obsessed with efficiency. Possibly due to my issues making me inefficient by nature, I tend to seek efficiency wherever I can, like some mirage in the desert of my mind.

        • Fuck spez@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Did I write this comment? I used to think I just did my best to deliberately waste as little time as possible to balance out all the time I waste involuntarily. Now I realize that I just can’t tolerate being idle, so the moment I initiate some automated process that will take more than a few seconds to complete, I start yet another task while waiting. This looks a hell of a lot more efficient on paper than it does in reality, though…

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I thought the issue there was the processor not being able to run a single core long enough.

      Or maybe it’s just how the operating system works?

      Have you tried Linux? I use Arch btw.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        If I had to liken ADHD to computer terms, I think I would blame a faulty task scheduler. That’s what issues the threads to the CPU. When Ryzen came out and also when Intel moved to Performance and Efficiency cores there were issues with efficient task scheduling.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    The ability to upload any ability into my mind that I can think of and be amazing at it.

    Shashahshaaa!

    Runs away and throws pocket sand

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Our ideas are always good to us, but they’re highly informed based on our own experiences and needs.

      I had a neighbor who asked me to help them create some form of device that sits on the dashboard of their car and catalog billboards. Apparently, a hole in their life was passing by a billboard with kids in the car and forgetting what exit the food/restaurant was on.

      This was in an era where cell phones and online maps/search existed.

      I had another acquaintance (decades ago) who wanted me to work on a photography simulator in which you had to manipulate people in 3D to compose a picture. I tried to explain the high level of difficulty and the cost per unit being so high that no one would be willing to pay for it. They pushed me until I did some napkin match on arists/developer/marketing costs then they got all pissed off at me because it came in conservatively north of 300k.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Universal language module. Not to translate all into English but to understand all of them.

  • sep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 days ago

    Read and write all languages. Be it swahili, mandarin, latin, hieroglyfs, python, c++ or java. ;)

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I want the entirety of mathematics indellably etched into my mental model. I want to see the math behind everything in reality the way Neo saw the matrix code in the walls of the grubby apartment buildings.

    • Cratermaker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      What if that just drives you insane due to the problem described by Gödel’s incompleteness theorem? Maybe you’d become susceptible to someone telling you “this statement is false”.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ideally, I wouldn’t have to see the proofs for everything, just recognize the observable math.

        The problem with the “This statement is false” could simply be coupled by something akin to imaginary numbers. Paradoxes can be described mathematically without being solvable.

        • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Oh, brother, no. Godel’s incompleteness theorem is a problem much bigger than imaginary numbers. Imaginary numbers are just something we initially didn’t account for but we can (and did) fix. Godel’s theorem means everything may just be broken and we just don’t know.

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.

    • blarth@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      And when you discover that free will is an illusion because of deterministic patterns, what will you do then?

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Honestly finding out the lack of free will exists would be the most liberating thing ever. I could just let autopilot take its course.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      But also the ability to turn it off at will. Otherwise life will become incredibly tedious.

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’d upload a few languages. Instantly being able to speak and read an array of languages and traveling the world would be fun.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is a good one. I interact with a lot of East and South Asians in my spare time, and I would love to speak all of their languages. Especially since their English is not the best (in my circle, that is).

  • TIN@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’d love to know how to dance, I mean really properly dance for every situation, not just a generic two foot shuffle. I’ve seen some people who can dance properly and they looked cool as fuck.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Musical ability — perfect pitch, great rhythm. I’m an okay musician after years working at it, but I’d love to be better.

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Sounds like you need to download pretty much everything ever written on mathematics, physics, biology, and medicine. That info dump would also have to include a bunch of stuff that hasn’t even been invented yet, and probably won’t be within the next 500 years.

      Once you have all that in your mind, you’ll be incredibly frustrated that modern day technology is at least 500 years away from what you actually need. You would need to build a bunch of quantum electronics fabrication factories so that you can build the real factories that actually produce the machines you need for assembling the very first brain reading and recording machine.

      Although, since you have all that revolutionary science and tech in your head, you should use that to fix global warming, world hunger, cancer and a bunch of other stuff so that you can raise the trillions of capital needed for building the main project.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I suspect it’ll be the other way around.

        Our brains must be augmented with tech first, then uploads are trivial.

        Start with a calculator, learn how to manipulate it and read it like proprioception. At some point we have an LLM on a chip in our head and updates to that update our consiousness.

        • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          That sort of tech would open some really interesting doors. If the human mind is augmented in one way or another, it becomes difficult to tell where the human part ends and machine begins.

          Once you take that to its logical conclusion, you being to ask questions like, what’s the difference between a human mind and a machine mind. Is there a meaningful difference?

          You could augment a human mind with machine parts, live your normal life and continue to augment more and more as your organic cells gradually die over the course of several decades. Once the last organic bits die of old age, there’s nothing but machine left and your transition to a digital life form is complete.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      That can be said about any form of communication. Words on a page convey what words spoken can’t always.

      The right touch in the right way Can connect you more than any sound or word could ever hope to.

      A painting can make me feel things a book can’t make me understand. A performance or dance can show me something i can’t hear or speak

      It’s different ways of experiencing experiences. What is communicated is not always the same between different subjects and objects. Even if they often do

      But also to your point hearing music IS different from feeling music and different from creating it. I think music as a communication tool is fuzzy and not very good at communicating clearly. Powerfully i dont deny but not everyone can be affected the same way by the same music either so it’s not a dependable form of communication.

      And sometimes yes those feelings can be conveyed by other means.

      But you seem like you might enjoy this song

      Ren - Hi Ren (the music video is worth watching if you listen to this one)