Everyone knows the tale of Brand X getting bought out by some faceless global conglomerate and going to shit, but does the opposite ever happen?

    • EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree But for a while he didn’t even do anything It was just jeb

      And I think it could of worked out But even with all of the dumb stuff Microsoft brought I can’t say it was a bad thing

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man Notch really turned out to me a mess didn’t he…? 😥

      I remember back in like 2012 he was one of my personal “heros”.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He got sucked into Right-wing extremism. Posting racist, sexist, homophobic and transphobic things on Twitter. Also got into Qanon I think.

            • Donkter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Someone below me posted a big video on that. Other than that it takes two seconds to Google. He has a history of saying extremely reactionary things (advocating for a straight pride parade, saying feminism is a disease, being transgender is just a mental illness etc.) And then walking it back which is weird that it happens over and over again. He also unironically believed in Qanon.

              Maybe not an outright fascist bigot but however his social system and brain works, it leads him to fall face first over and over into extreme right wing reactionary takes.

  • JakeBacon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Minecraft maybe? I would say at the minimum it’s a net neutral but considering how far off the deep end Notch is now I imagine it was a good thing.

    • Neve8028@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve made some pretty awful changes to the game since. That being said, I bet minecraft would have fizzled out if microsoft didn’t purchase them. They’re still pumping out regular updates and its popularity is huge. I’d definitely consider the acquisition an overall win.

        • Neve8028@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The game has overall become way too easy. 1.14 villagers completely broke gameplay making trading and building iron farms way too boring. The pre-1.14 mechanics were way more balanced and fun. Raid farms are just way too powerful especially with the nerf to natural spawning that 1.18 brought making witch farms basically unusable. Loads of features like that which just made things too easy. It feels like you’re rewarded too much for very little effort.

          Chat reports and microsoft migration are also really controversial, of course.

          Not to say that they haven’t made lots of positive changes but that’s my main gripe with the development over the past few years.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s only easy if you know all the tricks for farming and whatnot, normal players wouldn’t likely say it’s too easy necessarily, I also didn’t notice any big change between 1.13 and 1.14 unless you mean the light level thing?

            People will always find a way to break the system, and for longtime Minecraft players, it’s nice not having to do all gathering by hand, instead being able to use your knowledge to create a ridiculous farm is… Cool imo.

            To be honest though, I can’t really get into vanilla in general, I’m always playing modded if I’m playing myself, tho I watch vanilla players like Hermitcraft

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not familiar with the detail of that one - was he always a lunatic, or did that come with the money following the buyout?

  • realharo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oculus. No way they would have otherwise had the money to make cheap standalone VR headsets like the Quest.

      • realharo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everything that has a store requires an account.

        • Steam - you need Steam account (also applies to Valve Index then)
        • iPhone - you need Apple account
        • Android phones - you need Google account
        • Oculus before - you needed an Oculus account

        The short time during which they required a Facebook account (i.e. an account linked to an unrelated service) was a fuck-up, but they have since reversed that decision. Now it’s just a separate standalone VR-related account.

        If anything, that is still better than the current Google/Apple situation with their accounts, which link together a bunch of unrelated services (photos, email, payments, storage sync, etc.) in an inseparable way.

        • pyr0ball@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sorry to break it to you bruh, but if Facebook owns the IP, they’re harvesting and monetizing the account data, end of.

          This includes all of the subsidiaries like Instagram and WhatsApp as well.

          Let’s also not forget that illegal activity exposes user data in addition to greed, and just the fact that your data is in yet another pot increases your risk. Also yes all corporations are greedy and evil but they’re definitely not all equal in how bad they are, and FB is one of the worst

          Are you willing to compromise on all of these intrusions into your life? Many people are, but I’m not one.