EDIT: no, I don’t sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they’re losing an argument ;)

  • yukichigai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, let’s enter discussion with the literal Nazis so we can try to understand them. There might be nuance to their calls for mass genocide.

    Fuck off OP.

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s funny how people always use play it like “oh, it’s just differing opinions” when what they’re actually defending is indefensible malarkey like nazis and tankies. They know if they made a meme saying we should “try to understand” nazis and tankies, they’d be downvoted to oblivion. And so they hide behind a shield of “differing opinions”.

      These cretins have a right to post nazi and tankie shit on their own instances – them’s the beauty of the fediverse. But I also have a right to not want hate speech, genocide denial, and Hitler/Stalin/Mao simps polluting my feed. It’s not mere “differing opinions” when one person’s opinion is “Holodomor didn’t happen, and if it did, the Ukrainians deserved it” or “Holocaust didn’t happen, and if it did, the Jews deserved it” or whatever apologia they wanna peddle.

      • yukichigai@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s funny how people always use play it like “oh, it’s just differing opinions” when what they’re actually defending is indefensible malarkey like nazis and tankies. They know if they made a meme saying we should “try to understand” nazis and tankies, they’d be downvoted to oblivion. And so they hide behind a shield of “differing opinions”.

        There’s an actual term for this: Motte and Bailey. One of many hallmarks of disingenuous shitbirds.

  • MF_COOM [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    geordi-no defederate to maintain your very special echo chamber

    geordi-yes defederate to stop sh.tjust.works chuds from harassing your comrades in DMs with violent, transphobic and ableist attacks

  • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lmao “try and understand them” fuck off, OP. You’re not fooling anyone. There’s no point trying to understand assholes.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    No offense but this is kind of what happens in real life too. Nazi shows up to local bar. Barman or owner doesn’t throw them out. Eventually they invite their friends. It winds up being known a Nazi bar. People who don’t want to associate with Nazis no longer visit the bar. This is why intolerance of the intolerant is a thing.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This post assumes that a meaningful amount of defed instances are caused by simple lack of agreement. Often, it’s an orthogonal matter - it boils down to instance A actually understanding something about the userbase of instance B and saying “I’m not dealing with this shit, it’ll make the instance worse for its own users”. For example: the typical user of B might be disingenuous, or preach immoral prescriptions, behave like a chimp, or be a bloody stupid piece of trash that should’ve stayed in Reddit to avoid smearing its stupidity everywhere here.

    Are instance admins too eager to pull the trigger for defed? Perhaps, in some cases; specially because it handles groups of users instead of individuals. But those cases are better addressed through actual examples, not through a meme talking on generic grounds.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s intriguing how everyone that views themselves as moderates/liberals forget (or are unacquainted with it) about the paradox of tolerance.

    Tolerance implies everyone has a right to express their ideas and you want that. You want everything out in the open, so you can pick at it, dismantle it and render it pitiful, ridiculous and useless.

    You want the intolerant crying out loud that you are intolerant as that means you are doing the right thing. The intolerant want silence, forced, while the tolerant want noise, anger, tension.

    Remember that anything worthwhile needs to be fought for. Don’t regret being vocal and harsh towards intolerance.

    • yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That is a pretty ironic comment because that is not what the paradox of tolerance is at all. The paradox of tolerance is that intolerance needs to be suppressed for tolerance to exist, since tolerance can’t exist alongside intolerance.

      The paradox is that tolerance needs to be intolerant towards intolerance in order for a tolerant society to exist, literally the exact opposite of what you wrote.

  • TwoGems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    You can’t tolerate nazis or tankies. Bad reasoning altogether. Look at the state the USA is in right now because we decided to tolerate fascists.

    • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      One of those groups is white supremacists and the other wants to stop genociding the global south. That seems like a fine comparison to you?

    • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can’t enter a discussion with somebody who’s just trying to bombard you into submission. OP is wildly ignorant or just somebody sad they’re being defederated on a different account.

  • ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    lol its this shit every time libs see a legitimate left stance. im assuming you’ve seen the sh.itjust.works defed post. its like 5 super vocal users having a conniption fit that there are communists on the internet

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m so glad that the comments have (mostly) finally unified in agreement that defederating Nazis and other hideous people is the right move.