I notice a large number of ragebait-y political communities being spun up by new users with thousands of posts & ai profile header photos. I notice comment sections are more acrimonious, and foreign disinfo talking points are circulating a lot more prolifically than before the US election started ramping up.

Anyone else notice this? Any idea on how to combat it on this platform? Are there any communities built around creating block lists of obvious troll/ai/disinfo accounts & communities?

  • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    25 days ago

    I haven’t really noticed much, but that’s because I’ve taken to blocking political communities once they start bothering me by putting too many article links in the front page or being generally rageful.

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      I mean it’s in /asklemmy too. I suggested voting for Kamala a few days ago is better than Trump if we want to move closer to universal healthcare and apparently I’m a murderer of 70000 people because of a pragmatic view of voting for her is better than Trump.

      It was so quiet and nice a few weeks ago when everyone agreed for a short period Kamala was decent. Now the disinformation campaign has restarted, supporting her is supporting the “neo-liberal/pro-corporate agenda”. So bloody tired of conservative/Russian bots.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Oh, you support a mainstream candidate, huh? What else, do you like eating babies? Why don’t you just admit you’re evil incarnate and vote for my favored candidate instead?

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I don’t follow !politics@lemmy.world, but stuff like !news@lemmy.world and similar have been pretty political.

      But on the other hand, it’s not due to a downvoting campaign against non-political stuff or anything. It’s just because users there aren’t actually submitting much non-political news. I mean, I’m not really enthusiastic about ragebait and such, but on the other hand, I can’t exactly yell at someone for submitting something other than what I want to look at. The problem is just that there aren’t enough people out there submitting stuff that I do want to see at the moment.

      I mean, the real issue is that users need to do a certain amount of submitting and/or commenting to generate interesting stuff for others to read. The ratio drops as the size of a community increases; if communities are small, there has to be a higher ratio of content creation for the community to be viable.

      It doesn’t take a very high ratio if you have thousands of people in a community, but it’s still larger on the Threadiverse, in 2024, than it is on, say, Reddit.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        I can see where you’re coming from. I already blocked the news because I come here for memes and don’t like following the news anyways, but yeah, if you’re looking for non-political news, I guess that can be rough.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’d love to but where are you getting regular news (and please without ‘Elon musk might maybe sell stocks in tesla’ “news” and likewise) ?

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        That’s the neat part, I don’t. If there’s anything really important, it will leak into memes, or I’ll hear it from family members, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard a piece of news and thought “Oh, it’s a good thing I know that now.”