![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
Maybe you should try installing Linux on your gaming PC - then you’ll become a true believer.
Maybe you should try installing Linux on your gaming PC - then you’ll become a true believer.
I have never twatted on twitter, so I wont kiss on ten either.
X-Non-Deprecated-Checkmate
It’s a WEBP file, not a GIF.
TIL Tori Amos auditioned for the female lead, lol!
Suuuucks for development at least, it’s too small to divide into 3 zones, and if you divide by 2 you will just end up with a kink in your neck from always looking to the side. I’d rather have a single 27" with infinite virtual desktops I can shuffle around, than a 49" (my 49" has actually been collecting dust in storage for a couple of years now).
In Norway, we just get it prefilled based on automatically reported data, and it’s delivered by default after a certain date - you can of course make changes up until then (and retroactively up to 3 years later).
Incremental source generators are the new thing, and MS’s docs are not fully up to date. Some introductions:
https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/blob/main/docs/features/incremental-generators.md
Most screen sharing tools come with functionality for allowing another person to take control of mouse/keyboard, although it can be a bit laggy compared to more tailor made solutions.
I was kind of impressed of the precision of the advice given - it perfectly explained various FP patterns used in my code, and correctly concluded that it could not be refactored to be better/simpler/more generic, but suggested some good readability renamings. My general worry is that AI tools will hallucinate and/or just provide random or sub-optimal/average solutions.
Do you mean Live Share with an AI, or just as a feature for pair programming with humans? Doesn’t video conferencing tools work well enough for that?
Btw I use Arch