• kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Time is likely B-theoretic, not A-theoretic. There is no absolute simultaneity, so the relations between points in time are probably best described in the B-theory.

    Substance dualism is a silly conjecture, and neutral monism is just a sad attempt to grant legitimacy to shoddy arguments about mental constructs existing as some kind of concretia. It’s dualism in sheep’s clothing.

    The only thing sillier than substance dualism is substance idealism.

    Universals are descriptive, not proscriptive. Nominalism and particularism are better views of what actually exists.

    There is no such thing as an essentially ordered series. While they’re useful abstracts, in reality all series are accidentally ordered.

    Of the four causes, only material and essential usefully describe anything. Formal and final causes are, again, only useful in the abstract.

    I could go on, but I doubt anyone’s still awake…

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m going to attempt to understand this. Tell me where I’m wrong.

      No idea what A or B theory means, but relativity kind of blows a hole in simultaneity, so I assume that B theory has other implications like determinism or something. Something about relationships defining everything.

      Chairs only exist in our brains I guess. Brains also invented themselves. Spooky

      Plato is silly?

      This might have some implications about there not being underlying rules to reality, or that we can never really get anything more than a shadow of them.

      Not sure about this one. It might be more epistemological than metaphysical.

      The creation and end of existence aren’t as important as the rules and the observable state of things?

      I could google these things, but I had fun doing it this way.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Solid! I’m going to put together a broader and more detailed comment that should clarify some things, but if you’re a newbie to philosophy, you did a pretty darn good job.