• DMBFFF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Apparently Rothbard wasn’t as bad as Himmler, but he was bad enough.

      You no more have to be a disciple of Rothbard, Rand, or Hoppe to be a libertarian, anymore than you have to be a tankie to be leftist, however tankies might say otherwise.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Apparently Rothbard wasn’t as bad as Himmler,

        Of course not - the likes of Rothbard or Rand will never be caught dead close to the mass-graves their ideological grifting helped to dig.

        anymore than you have to be a tankie to be leftist

        I make a hard distinction between leftists and political racketeers masquerading as leftists right until they get the power they crave. I place everything spawned by the Bolsheviks in the latter category.

        There is nothing unique or new about this distinction.

        • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Rand wrote about the Nazis and fascists.

          She didn’t like them.

          So are you saying that your brand of leftism was spawned before the Bolsheviks—i.e. over 100 years ago?

          What do you think about Karl Marx, a 19th century political philosopher, IIUC?

          • masquenox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            She didn’t like them.

            She sure liked their methods.

            So are you saying that your brand of leftism was spawned before

            The French didn’t invent left or right - they just invented a useful shorthand to distinguish between the two.

                • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hoxha, probably Tito and Castro, arguably Pol Pot, Guzman, arguably the PFLP.

                  • masquenox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Perpetrating mass-murder against the working class doesn’t conform to any worthwile description of the term “socialism” - so that disqualifies everyone on your list except Tito and Castro. And I’d describe them purely as nationalists.