EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

  • TomAwsm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Okay, but if anyone forms full beliefs from single studies, they’ve grossly misunderstood the details of how science works.

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This particular hierarchy is specific to medical science, it doesn’t fit the other scientific disciplines perfectly.

      Also, if I had a nickle for every conflicting pair of meta-analyses… happens so often.

      • TomAwsm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fair, but my point is that it illustrates how much stock one should put in single studies.