• IdiosyncraticIdiot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Imagine being in a corporate environment trying to implement an OSS into your platform and having to tell your 50 yo teammate: “Oh yeah, just pop in this Discord server real quick to see any relevant info”. Instant credibility loss

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The loss of credibility is not because it’s discord,. specifically.

      It’s because the project thinks a chat platform is an appropriate way to document a project. I would feel the same way if someone told me to get on IRC for docs, or Slack.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not even a forum.

            Documentation is not a snapshot of a discussion. It largely falls into two categories

            • collections of facts e.g. what command line switches there are, or all the options in the config files.
            • Guides on how to use the software.

            The first is vital. The second is really really useful.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is often done by people while the project is unstable. No need to write documentation that gets outdated every few weeks, when you can help people live in discord.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      thats understandable but at least use something searchable that has tagging capabilities and is archivable so that you can come back to it years later

      • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        D*scord is technically searchable and fairly archiveable (messages never get deleted due to old age (in my experience at least) or if the original poster deletes their account). And some d*scord servers even have a Q&A mode similar to st*ck *verflow. But yeah, not the right tool for the job, not to mention ABSOLUTELY PROPRIETARY

        • cheer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think what they really mean is searchable without an account, but otherwise you’re right.

            • vithigar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Or find lots of things that aren’t matches because it’s a fuzzy search with no way to search for exact text.

      • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Zulip is a little better in this regard. I’m involved in Lean, which uses Zulip as the primary mode of support and documentation. While it’s usable, I still think that a Discourse style forum is the way to go.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      To be fair, I could say the same, but is probably a biased sample.

      I have other red flags, like only distributing on docker, that I’ve tried, and tried again, and found that it’s a sign of a badly run project. But I can’t state any confidence on the discord based rule, because I’ve never tried to make any run.