• Sprinklebump@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sankara isn’t a non-tankie just because he didn’t live to the tankie phase, he was always acting as an ML.

    I believe there is a difference in being ML and having police state aspirations/trending authoritarian. Which is when I use the term tankie.

    Maybe I’m wrong tho you tell me. I liked what sankara did and I dont want to negate the cool things he did simply becuase he got murdered and we dont know what he was going to become.

    There is nuance in his life that I can accept. But what I cannot accept is modern day MLs who look fondly on the actions of the USSR, russian federation and the modern day CPC. they are large authoritarian states that I cannot support as an anarchist.

    Everytime I bring this up tho. I get called a lib.

    • Graylitic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s pretty simple. Most MLs critically support ML states. Almost all of them, for example, hate that Stalin banned homosexuality. At the same time, they can also appreciate how both Mao and the USSR doubled life expectancy and ended famine. By metrics, both states improved rapidly.

      As an Anarchist, you can learn a lot from MLs on how to actually get stuff done. Anarchism is a beautiful dream currently, outside of fringe cases like Revolutionary Catalonia it hasn’t actually existed to a meaningful extent. I’m not saying you should become an ML, but MLs typically take their routes because it gets results, even if the Means aren’t pretty at all.

      I’m saying this as a non-ML Marxist.