I saw some threads here about Telegram and piracy stuff being banned. So, as an experimental alternative, I created a public Signal group for piracy.

Maybe it’ll be useful?

Before joining

Signal supports usernames and hiding telephone numbers. Here’s a blog entry on how to do so. You might want to:

  • set a username
  • change your profile name (these are two separate things!)
  • hide your phone number
      • liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sure they don’t log the IPs, but it is technically impossible to not know the IP when you’re running a centralized service.

        • blicante@moist.catsweat.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          What are the “popular” alternatives? Telegram stores everything, WhatsApp doesn’t allow usernames, Matrix requires IPs too…

            • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Despite their claims of total privacy, I imagine, like any software company, they have full access to their own back end including encryption keys and server logs. Meaning they can and probably will moderate their own platform if there is enough pressure from nation states/IP owners.

                • DaGeek247@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You understand that, for everyone except for a complete network pro, that is worse for security and privacy, right?

                  Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that you can.

                  But the reason piracy websites struggle so much with long term stability isn’t because they’re hosting the wrong software.

                  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    If you don’t put trust on someone something, you left yourself to trust and do all the works. However, you don’t trust yourself either, sadly I can’t offer any solutions.

          • liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            TBH I would just use email over TOR and encrypt communication with PGP. Rotate identities every now and then and you should be fine. Yes it doesn’t have forward secrecy but it removes the effort to find the “right messaging” service and is instead ubiquitous (and you can sign up for anonymous email addresses online too, which makes it even better).

    • uiiiq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The phone number is not connected to the messages. That’s the only thing they have. It is the best app for privacy.

      • liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Arguable in it being “the best app for privacy”. Can you link to a source which shows that phone numbers are not linked to accounts? (Why do they need them anyway?)

        • uiiiq@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          They have published requests from the law enforcement and their responses to these requests. The only unencrypted data they have is the phone number, a date of sign up and a date of the last login. That is it, everything else is encrypted and they cannot access it whatsoever.

            • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              No you don’t.

              I can go to the corner shop/local garage right now, buy a SIM card for 99p and then buy a top-up voucher in cash to have a completely anonymous phone number.

              Albeit is the UK in Europe again? 🙈

              edit: where I would be worried if my privacy was on the line is I could also go to the local pawn shop / Cash Converters to ensure that SIM card isn’t associated with an IMEI I’ve previously used and buy in cash a cheapo phone.

            • uiiiq@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              So what? The law enforcement knows you have an account and knows the sign up date and last login. That doesn’t affect your privacy whatsoever. Besides, Europe isn’t a monolith. You can absolutely buy and use a SIM card without disclosing your name in some countries.

            • blicante@moist.catsweat.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Sometimes, but that’s it. Authorities and signal itself can only say “this number has account with us since $signupDate and used it last on $usageDate”. Signal can’t say “we know $number is talking to $otherNumber” nor can they say “$number is in $group talking to $users”.