• Squirrel@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Obnoxious, lying, seditious, narcissistic, rotting corpse vs. tired, confused, rotting corpse.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m concerned about the less rotted corpse employing living humans. Sounds like nepotism to me.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Biden should be the last time the Democrats put forward a senile old man as their presidential nominee. Even if he wins this election, there will be another one to fight in 4 years time and the fash might not lose again.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      It should be the last time they put a candidate that nobody wants. Remember 2016? They don’t.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s not totally true, it’s just who the ownership class wants. They’re the only real people anyway, we’re all just labor.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Old people primary voting: See if you can stop me choosing the next old man from your house! Ha!

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Rotting” is a state that won’t last past the middle 30s. By 2056 they’ll be fully decomposed.

  • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lemmitors: You don’t understand! I’m not voting for Slightly More Rotting Corpse, I’m voting for the Slightly More Rotting Corpse administration. Yes it’s true that both of them support nuclear warfare along the Mexican border, but Rotting Corpse would be dropping more nukes with higher frequency on the climate refugees so we have to vote for the lesser evil.

      • force@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Shoot them

        We’re allowed to kill Abe Lincoln and JFK, why aren’t we allowed to kill these guys? Why does Reagan get plot armor out of all the presidents? Who wrote this shit?

        To be fair JFK getting shot was pretty epic though. He almost caused nuclear holocaust (although a more rabidly anti-communist president may have definitely caused nuclear holocaust), war crimed the South Vietnamese a ton, and stabilized Israel. RFK getting assassinated was less epic because that gave us Nixon

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          You have a very twisted view of the world. No one was “allowed” to shoot Abe Lincoln or JFK. It was very much not allowed, but murderers don’t usually care about what’s allowed and do it anyway.

      • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        As I’ve said elsewhere, to fix it from within the system itself you would need a bloc of people willing to punish one of the parties for moving right by withholding their votes and their donations. To fix it from without the system is also possible, but would require some “authoritarianism” in the form of people with guns. Anything else is just people flailing around ineffectually and getting mad at others who aren’t flailing in the ineffectual way that they prefer.

        Either way you’ve got the same problem: getting a large enough group of people together who are willing to do the thing. Socialists of all stripes have been trying to crack that egg for over a hundred years and the only ones who had any success were the ones that managed to get the peasants on their side because peasants have a certain amount of class consciousness that proles don’t.

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          so suppose you let trump win to spite the dnc. then what? what are you going to tell all the people whose rights are being taken away?

          • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            6 months ago

            If you had enough people to do the thing, then you would be able to protect members of the group at a local level while national orgs realign and/or get replaced.

            But nobody has a large enough group of people to do the thing. In the absence of a large enough group of people to do the thing, voting is a purely personal decision that will not effect the outcome.

            • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              “If there were enough people who cared about trans lives to actually change the outcome of the election, you wouldn’t need the law to protect them – you could just make them do it.”

              Please God tell me I’m misreading this. People in Texas can just get fucked I guess?

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sorry; what would be the alternative NOW?!?

          I don’t see all that happening before it’s time to vote, so isn’t what you’re saying now a bit of a distraction from the very real risk to the stability of the country?

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      When the American populace as a whole is brainwashed into believing the only choices are red and blue, you have to accept that whining about it and voting green (or not voting) is going to accomplish nothing.

      So make your colorful allegory and feel good about yourself on the internet. In the end, you are accomplishing less than the people you look down on who recognize the shitty reality of our situation.

      • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        If choosing red or blue doesn’t work, and choosing another option also doesn’t work, then what good does feeling self righteous about your decision to pick one over the other do? Unless you’re suggesting that the shitty reality of our situation is that we’re fucked and nothing will work at all no matter what - which is a level of defeatism that I don’t think is very helpful either.

        • Charapaso@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Voting for the slightly less shit option makes it easier for the things we do in parallel to have a positive impact: direct action doesn’t get slowed down much by voting once a year or so.

          • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I won’t deny that people can do multiple things at once, I just don’t agree with the premise that voting matters in the current paradigm.

            • Charapaso@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I don’t think it does much, but any tiny contribution to the fight against climate change is a good for the world, as is any slowing of the erosion of civil rights domestically, gutting of what remains of medicare/medicaid, etc.

              I also know a GOP administration will be worse in terms of fighting against leftist movements in the streets, if only slightly. They’re definitely worse re: labor movements overall, again: even if only marginally.

              So I’m not going to claim it’s a panacea, or even someone that will have notable effects, but I do think it matters at the margins, so the effort required is usually worth it, IMHO

        • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Being self righteous about doing nothing is worse.

          Despite your own brand of defeatism in insisting the outcome is the same no matter what, one side actually is better. Even if the metric of “better” pales on the grand scheme of what we deserve or should be doing.

          I’m not trying to project self-righteousness by recognizing that there are only two real choices. I’m asserting that advocating non-action or pointless action is such a tired trope that what you’re doing is circlejerking for dopamine instead of applying what little influence you have as an individual to work toward the avoiding the actual worst outcome.

  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you’ve ever watched Overlord you’d know the dead deserve to rule over the living

        • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’ve only finished the anime up to season 4, but I don’t think the theme is that “Nazarick is evil and evil skeleton overlord is fun”, but rather “do the ends justify the means Nazarick takes”, given that Ainz wants to create a utopia where all races live in harmony. It’s very interesting writing given how much time and humanity is given to side characters that are eventually destroyed or imperialized by Nazarick.

          • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            They are somewhat nuanced and ideologically motivated bad guys, I’ll give you that. And it does make the anime interesting, especially compared to your standard isekai/VRMMO anime

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I actually wasn’t picking on overlord specifically, more like political and economic statements in anime tend to be right wing liberal stuff.

      • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        For someone that hates the right you make a lot of generalizations. Every country with power is a mess politically, but that says nothing about their art.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not going to go on a quest for iskeai Reaganomics and general nationalistic and racist themes, but I’m sure you won’t have a hard time with some self study on that front.

          • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            That’s funny because if you actually watched Overlord you’d know Ainz’ goal (besides getting back to the real world) is to create a utopia where all races are equal. But keep throwing buzzwords if it makes you feel good.

            • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              I was making a general statement about when anime has a political theme, not on that particular anime. Though I guess you could find a utopian vision in a nation that views all to be equally worthless and champions genocide and calling the dark young of shub niggurath to stomp on people.

              • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I was making a general statement about when anime has a political theme, not on that particular anime.

                Only anime I know of where this is actually a thing is Attack on Titan, but I haven’t watched the last season (apparently it deviates from the source material, maybe for this reason, which is why I haven’t).

                Though I guess you could find a utopian vision in a nation that views all to be equally worthless and champions genocide and calling the dark young of shub niggurath to stomp on people.

                Yeah, I do like multifaceted morally grey and villainous characters with interesting or even aspiring motives. I highly recommend Hunter X Hunter, The number of characters in that anime that aren’t majorly flawed in one way or another you can count on your fingers. One of the communities favorite characters is a murderous pedo clown that serves as the main characters mentor and drop-in father-figure for a large part of the story. If you watch any single anime and never watch anime again, let it be HxH.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    But Slightly More Rotting Corpse has the better environmental policy which we’ll need before the last remnant of Florida is fully swallowed by the sea in the next 4 years.

  • Aaiding@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    For more than a hundred centuries the Emperor has sat immobile on the Golden Throne of Earth. He is the Master of Mankind by the will of the gods and master of a million worlds by the might of his inexhaustible armies. He is a rotting carcass writhing invisibly with power from the Dark Age of Technology. He is the Carrion Lord of the Imperium, for whom a thousand souls die every day, for whom blood is drunk and flesh eaten. Human blood and human flesh – the stuff of which the Imperium is made.