• 2 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle








  • yetAnotherUser@feddit.detoMemes@lemmy.mlNeedle therapy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Placebos work even when you knows it’s a placebo though. Pointing out something is a placebo is important because many are at best overpriced scams (homeopathy) and at worst actively harmful (chiropracty). The culture behind many placebos is also rife with pseudoscience and advocates against seeking out genuine care, so you should ensure nobody gets invested into placebos past a certain point.

    One can make an informed decision regarding taking placebos if and only if one knows it’s a placebo, else one will be scammed and/or harmed.





  • Killing 50% of any one people is genocide, right? For example, the Nazis killed up to 50% of European Romani people and it is classified as a genocide.

    Let’s assume killing 50% of n peoples is genocide.

    Since killing 50% of n peoples is genocide, killing 50% of n+1 peoples must also be genocide, else a number N would exist such that killing 50% of N - 1 peoples is genocide but killing 50% of N peoples is not. The existence of such a number N would be quite contradictory, as it would imply one could undo genocide by killing more people. Additionally, if one were to first kill 50% of N - 1 people and then kill 50% of one more people some time later, both events would be classified as genocide, since killing 50% of one people is assumed to be genocide.

    Therefore, Thanos did in fact commit genocide.



  • Doch, ich glaube aber ChatGPT interpretiert das Zitat als gegen das Genderverbot. Die Aussage “ist ein klares Signal” ist ja nicht unbedingt befürwortend. Hier meine Interaktion mit ChatGPT:

    Ich:

    Überprüfe diese Aussage eines Politikers bezüglich Grammatik und logischer Konsistenz. Der Politiker spricht sich für das Verbot aus.

    “Das Gendern-Verbot in Hessen ist ein klares Signal. Wir wollen keine Sprachpolizei!”

    ChatGPT:

    Grammatikalisch ist die Aussage korrekt. Inhaltlich könnte sie jedoch als inkonsistent betrachtet werden, da das Verbot des Genderns als Maßnahme zur Regulierung der Sprache selbst als eine Form von sprachpolizeilicher Intervention interpretiert werden könnte.