Crack comes from the crackle sound you get when smoking if you use baking soda to make the freebase. I use ammonia. Nowadays they just use the name crack for freebase cocaine, which isn’t really accurate. Where I live we just call it smoking coke because almost everybody uses ammonia, and most people don’t buy freebase directly.

So to be accurate we should call it “freebase cocaine” and not “crack”.

300 euro’s worth of cocaine that I smoked in a day.

I’m not proud of it, and I don’t often smoke it, but it was a fun day.

Are you referring to me? Because I am not.

That’s pretty gay.

You don’t know what daddy and Billy did in the panel before.

Was the password on macys randomly generated? Or do you think that could have been the same password as another website?

I am the admin of a website where we have a place where our users can post custom content and rate the content of others.

We have discussed how it works and should work many times and came to the conclusion that we’d never want it to be public. Any report of abuse will be checked by the website owner directly in the database and even admins don’t have full access. Everybody tries to stay as far away from the personal ratings as possible.

We also noticed that it would be a lot more fragile when there are not many voters. A whole group that is negative about something wouldn’t get as much harassment as a single person having a unique opinion.

On our website we have a comment section that isn’t anonymous, and we even noticed that people often don’t post something negative when it would be obvious that they are the only one who has voted/rated something. (“Negative” is almost always constructive in our case)

These are just a few things that I think add to this discussion.

Making a browser addon/extension wouldn’t be too hard if you can get the data somewhere. And then it’s just a click of a button to get the functionality.

Hence why I gave a solution. It would simply become spam that should be handled by the instance where it originates from.

What if an instance sends 1000 fake hashes as votes?

What’s the difference from users though?

You’d give each user an anonymous vote ID that only the instance can link back to their username.

It should actually be made more private.

I have no idea what you’re trying to say.

Comparable not really. The EU has a population of 450 million compared to 350 million of the US. Europe itself has more than double at 750 million. Also, there are many more countries outside of Europe that have a lot of people that speak English online.

Besides a strong military ally it has indeed not had much positive impact.

Smarter Americans do it too. It’s mostly small things, like saying they are from “Georgia” which is a country, while “Georgia, USA” is the state. Using the “Politics” communities (and subreddits) for USA Politics, while all the other countries just post it in their country community (/subreddit). Talking about “southern people” as if that internationally means southern USA people. “Why is my hospital bill so big???” without mentioning they are from the USA (we can figure that one out easily). I can literally keep going on and on.

Good.

Now go and tell your fellow countrymen.

Yes.

Keep in mind that American elections are coming up and Americans think the internet is only about them. So we’re not only being dragged into this by disinformation campaigns.

Or a fun gadget for a stalker.

New CEO and questionable new “privacy” stuff.