You changed your whole argument from your parent comment so you could keep defending calling people names.

Calling someone any of those names is uncceptable. And has nothing to do with people calling for Elon Musk to be murdered.

In fact, in the victims thread, you were the one suggesting to me that people should resort to violence rather than bringing attention to abuse.

And again you’re the one playing the victim lol

deleted by creator

Noise in a RNG. Hungry, more likely to give into majority opinion so I can get back to brunch!

Maybe they just want a future where billionaires aren’t burning down the planet.

Course they could pick up pitchforks and take matters into their own hands. Quit blaming other people for their problems right?

I thought that was the GOP

I mean the first person to come to mind when I heard victim mentality was Donald Trump.

I think whoever framed the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt felt that way.

Jurors themselves are complicated. Some people are racist, some people are just hateful, some people respect authority so much that they’ll just believe whatever the district attorney says. All of these conditions can create a situation where the jury won’t reach consensus easily .

And pretty much everybody just wants to get back to brunch and taking care of their families.

I think what you are speaking to is values. What I’m talking about is emotions as they are felt in the moment and how those will affect a jury’s outcome.

Hence people are not computers.

No

People aren’t machines and don’t weigh data the way machines do.

It’s more like this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory

Than this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_choice_theory

Drugs

Most of the liberals on here just want to be back at brunch. So those are the feelings you’re getting.

Personally, her hypocrisy over weed means little to me compared to the children she’s planning to help murder.

And, I’ll still vote for her because more children will die from climate change under Trump.

I’m voting against worsening climate change. Outside of that they’re both neo liberal shitheads.

So you won’t vote for someone supported by Nazis but will vote for someone supporting Nazis.

I guess hypocricy really doesn’t matter.

I did a Behavior Activation Therapy course and we used a tool similar to what you posted in the OP.

Only we listed a few activities along with how difficult we thought it would be. Each morning we would reflect on the activities we got done and write down how difficult they actually ended up (sometimes more or less). And make a new list.

The process helped me to challenge a lot of thoughts and emotions around activities.

This is more like her insisting you not eat cashews, because she hates cashews.

Only in this case her hate is homophobic/transphobic. Women can wear boy stuff. And men can, in theory, wear ‘queer’ stuff. As long as it’s not her partner doing it.

So, left equals centrist I see.

Yeah I’m not a fan of it lol. Thanks though.

How does it check for bias? Because pink news isn’t left on trans issues. Yet it ranks as left with high credibility.

https://lemm.ee/post/40108612

In older mice the best telomere therapies are increasing lifespan by ~15%. Max human lifespan is currently ~120. So, if those same therapies work on old billionaires they still wouldn’t live past 150.

Models for extending life in young mice and mice zygotes hit around ~25%.

200 isn’t within our grasp currently. 150 is if the animal models work on humans. But the treatments work better the younger the animal. Working best on embryos.

Tldr: It’s unlikely today’s billionaires will live past 150 without a breakthrough in telomere research.

I was going to say a frog since they can change sex.

But jellyfish can apparently change sex and be immortal, so, I change my answer to the immortal jellyfish too.

XY people AFAB have a genetic condition that makes their bodies insensitive to testosterone. Their testicles never drop. They don’t develop body hair or menstrate.

And they have more trouble than XX women developing muscle mass.

None of this has anything to do with the Olympics because Fox News is making shit up.

Some animals do have language and animals that are around people a lot likely have an inner voice that is their owner’s voice.

They likely don’t plan using this voice, the way people do. But it certainly influences their behavior.

A dog that’s been yelled at for getting in the garbage might hear a no in their head even if their owners at work.

I’m sure it depends on the animal. In fact humans think in at least two inner voices.

The ear consciousness is receptive, and the speech consciousness is active.

What I mean by this is a dog or another animal that spends a lot of time with people likely has a passive inner voice of their owner. A dog might hear an owner yell no when they go to do something the owner doesn’t like, even if their owner isn’t around.

Animals that are capable of speech such as a parrot, will likely have an active speech consciousness. Which is more somatic in tone.

For example, when I am in active speech consciousness I can feel my jaw and tongue muscles move. When in passive listening consciousness, my ears might move or strain to try to hear the inner speech.

With practice these somatic sensations can be decoupled from their internal sense consciousnesses. Which tends to help them quiet down and deepen meditation.

This is one of my favorite practices that’s accessible for people who don’t really meditate. The guided meditation is the first fifteen minutes of the video, so you don’t have to listen for the whole hour to get an inkling of what I’m pointing at.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OW9LNSVjPo