• 0 Posts
  • 105 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle

  • theneverfox@pawb.socialtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldThe mark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    The way I see it, it’s just a form of therapy. People don’t walk in and sit silently, they talk about their problems and get vague reassurance that everything is going to be alright - or occasional advice when they’re way out of bounds

    I don’t think it’s unethical to do that, so long as you operate in good faith with good intentions







  • I like watching stream highlights, occasionally I’ll watch one live. But they’re generally pretty boring, even as background noise - they’re on there for hours at a time

    I don’t think the relationship itself is bad, but it’s a relationship between you (massively plural) and an individual. It’s like being part of a crowd. I get that people like it, but I don’t get much out of it


  • I’m split, but I lean slightly towards no. On one hand, it could be good for discoverability, and it would help my efforts to make a client-side algorithm

    On the other hand, it will make one of Lemmy’s problems worse - engagement. Some people will vote less, and it’s already feeling a little quieter around here as the numbers settled after the Reddit Exodus. I doubt it’ll be a massive change, but a .5% decrease in voting, permanently, could make a difference

    Ultimately, you can see it on federated platforms, so shrug



  • So this isn’t a compelling argument because it sounds outlandish and the implications (while serious) are indirect

    Every major power, and some companies, have population simulations. It’s not that hard to build one - we’ve been using them for decades, and they start yielding useful results even when they’re pretty simple. Individuals are complex, but populations can be boiled down with statistics pretty easily

    Let’s say I want to increase stochastic violence in America. I rate the traits of as many people as I can across as many useful criteria as I can measure. I could then tweak an algorithm to show something I think would radicalize people to a test group, and measure again. I then take what I learned, and polish my approach until I’m ready to go live

    You can do this to whatever end you like - and browsing habits can only tell a human so much, but this is what big data does. It finds associations humans wouldn’t see through math

    This probably sounds like I’m wearing a tin foil hat, but this is a real thing. This is how foreign election interference works - astroturfing blindly only does so much, and modeling a population isn’t difficult (depending on what you’re trying to do)

    Now as for browsing habits - like location data or Facebook friends, with enough data points you can find out things about a person they don’t know themselves. It may or may not make sense to a human, but big data is all about finding associations through blind math.

    If you provide a set of data points, you contribute. It may or may not influence you, but either way it improves the ability to influence those around you.

    I don’t know how much opera collects, I don’t know how much of that data is exfiltrated to China. I know I don’t want anyone to have too much of that data, but I also have to live my life.

    It’s a matter of harm reduction - educate yourself on your choices, listen to people who dive deeper than you’re willing to, and do what you can to make the most ethical choice based on where you are right now. There’s no perfect choice


  • theneverfox@pawb.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlAn alternate timeline
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You guys are circling around the answer

    Aero looks, better menus (I refuse to believe nested drop downs are peak layout, but ribbon stuff looks pretty, at the cost of useful organization)

    And finally, make it look good in dark mode. We aren’t a print-first culture anymore, and I prefer my retinas intact



  • Yes, the fact you explained it, as well as formatting it in a spoiler for those who want to think it over a little longer (like me), made me feel slightly happier

    To be honest, I don’t remember the original post at the moment, but I remember that you explained a post in a way that made me feel appreciative that you’re on the platform. I want to be the kind of person to express that.

    That’s the person I want to be, and I’m glad that you are who you are





  • I just remember the day, as a software dev with a solid understanding of Blockchain, my older dev neighbor started explaining how NFTs worked

    I thought he was confused or stupid or something.

    “Wait, so like you have these super rare images, proof you own it on a Blockchain, and a link to the place they’re all publicly hosted?”

    Him: “Yep”

    “And the only use for these right now is as a profile picture?”

    Him: Shrug, “yeah, people use them for discord and stuff”

    “But… Couldn’t you just download the image and use it anyways?”

    Him: “Yeah, it’s all publicly hosted”

    And it was about then my brain locked up. I did multiple hours of research later, sure I had to be missing something