Reminds me of a time in elementary school when our class had a lesson on the importance of reading all instructions before starting a project, then we had a test with long, elaborate instructions. Of course, the very last sentence was something along the lines of disregarding all previous instructions and setting your pencil down. I think maybe one other kid besides me got it and was sitting there while the rest of the class was furiously working away, some of them wondering how we were already finished.

I think the Gauntlet counted any beings that either depended on another to live or supported another to live as all one unit for simplicity’s sake.

Do people really usually have a more vivid picture in their heads?

I can’t speak for others, but I do if they’re concepts I’ve encountered before. I have “default” visualizations of things that are changed if the description warrants it.

I imagined the same red, baseball-ish sized rubber ball. Not sure why that’s my default for “ball.”

Yeah, it was a little more obvious in his old design (and makes sense considering his rivalry with Mickey).

I didn’t know there were places that even asked that.

I was being hyperbolic. The original usage is completely incorrect, because if nobody said nothing, then everybody said something.

Nobody: “We need a ‘nobody:’ in there!”

Oh, what a feeling!

Started playing the Silent Hill 2 remake on Sunday. As a big fan of the original, I think they did a phenomenal job. Combat is harder, but that’s a pretty low bar.

Hmm, does it count if the animal (human, in this case) could be omnivorous, but chooses not to for whatever reason?

Pureisutēshon

“Clean floors is the right of all sentient beings.”

I imagine that he doesn’t remember he’s already tried it, tries again, then posts it repeatedly using different verbiage each time.

At least he only tweeted that once.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Try “alone” or “by yourself” instead of “introvert.” (I assume that’s the word you meant.)