Haha, well this aged like milk

And you can’t enforce ANY rule without protecting your people against bad faith arguing. It’s a foundation of ALL communities, whether explicitly written in its guidelines or not, because meaningful debate is the foundation of ALL human interaction and is primarily what abuse and harassment is.

The needs of your people are more important than your laziness, selfishness, and unwillingness to do your job. Don’t like it? Step the fuck down. You go find a different community to play king over if you don’t like it.

Then what good is your moderation? The whole fucking point of having you around is TO police bad faith arguing. That’s what mods are FOR.

I taught myself how to cook and it’s been life-changing.

Because he lost his joy at some point in his life and Disney adults remind him of what he lost, which angers him

I humbly request you post this in https://lemmy.cafe/c/benjamingetthemusket

Make the thread and I’ll pin it

👆

Because I refuse to give up on speaking the truth about the matter, and how corrupt the admins are, and demonstrating the very serious flaws and problems Lemmy as a platform has (there are a lot of ways people can exploit Lemmy to be a massive douche canoe, for starters).

Because truth is valuable for its own sake even if no one will listen.

People really ought to go back to separate websites and small forums, and get away from federation in general. It doesn’t do any real good.

Stupid fucking ideas.

It’s almost like federation is a stupid fucking idea that doesn’t work

It’s almost like it’s fundamentally broken and no one else wants to admit it

I get that what he’s trying to do, it’s just his actions are self-defeating. The only reason the behavior on social media has violent consequences is because he’s imposing them; no one else in that story is killing people based on meaningless Facebook polls. They only matter because he makes them matter. He causes the problems he thinks he is solving.

Also he assumes his actions will make people reconsider their choices and change, which they won’t because people for the most part aren’t capable of change. Most people don’t have the ability to do so. Those who do deliberately refuse to because they’re happy the way they are regardless of their true nature’s consequences to other people.

It’s just a stupid gimmicky show pretending to be deep to get views. That’s all.

So in that killer’s mind, wanting someone killed was the morally indefensible crime but actually killing ludicrous numbers of people is not? And he nor anyone else questioned that? 🤔

If personal attacks are the only response you can give, then they’re clearly right and you’re clearly wrong.

If they don’t, I’m out