Thankfully the AI use is very tame so far, used for stuff like offline alt text generation and offline translation. I’m personally still concerned about copyrights and ethics of the models used, but at least it’s directed towards providing specific features, not a magic cure-all.
This is a bit of a conspiracy theory, but consider… Even if you buy a different brand, maybe they’re doing the same? Maybe people bought a different brand, experienced the same thing, and decided to go Samsung next?
I think the vibrant red lips remind me of his red hair stripe, now that you mention it
Okay, but what about cat mlems and one orange braincell? Or greebles, cats being scared by cucumbers, cat circles…
Don’t forget people are different, misiphonia is a thing - something you consider normal might be absolutely infuriating to be around for some people.
Git might not count because you can have branches that then merge? But yeah, git is useful, it’s decentralized and distributed, it could be used P2P…
If they are competent, the website doesn’t communicate with OpenAI directly - instead you’re sending messages to their servers, and they add extra text to the prompts before sending requests to OpenAI, before they return the replies to your browser.
So no, probably not.
If you look at the image, you get, for example:
deR diE daS diE
The third and fourth like don’t match up as nicely, but I think it’s specifically the endings for each
On the topic of whether or not it’s an emulator, sounds like semantics in the end - fair enough, I disagree but you make a fair point.
That said, in terms of security I think it’s very important to point it out that it isn’t any more secure than running a random Linux executable. In my view, the original comment is advocating for running unknown executables under wine as a security measure, and the further argument is that it’s more secure because most attacks don’t target that.
Sounds like if people rely on that for security, malware will just start targeting that after people get used to assuming it’s safe.
WINE is not safe to run malware in, it’s not a secure sandbox. AFAIK, anything expecting it can do anything a Linux binary can. (Also, not an emulator, it’s in the original name - WINE Is Not an Emulator)
If the quote is accurate, he went a step further and put pirated games on the devices. Even if pirating the game is legal in some way (he owns it legitimately so putting a copy is fine or something), sending such devices out to customers then means he’s also distributing pirated games.
That said, somebody in the comments claimed he didn’t distribute games, but rather software that made it easy to pirate games - I don’t know what the precedent is for that being considered illegal, but it does call the original claims into question.