I would suspect never.

Either they are obsessed with their “work” and do it far more than that, or they do nothing.

I’m guessing they have a job like mine, where a driving trip is a relatively rare occurrence and micromanaging the travel isn’t worth it to mitigate the risk of paying out a little more.

Yeah, that’s a grandmother, so what?

Just have a bookshelf behind you during the interview, you’ll be golden.

Or maybe have the oval office as a backdrop, that might really make you qualified.

What we didn’t know was that Zebras evolved to defeat AI comera recognition.

Well that’s why they set up a ministry to manage the silly walks, to make sure they complied with gait recognition before they were used.

Left half of my face black, right half of my face white. Then I could fight those no good people who have a black right side of their face and white left side.

I like this edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chevrolet_Citation&diff=prev&oldid=1180412779&title=Chevrolet_Citation&diffonly=1

Yep, and I see evidence of that over complication in some ‘getting started’ questions where people are asking about really convoluted design points and then people reinforcing that by doubling down or sometimes mentioning other weird exotic stuff, when they might be served by a checkbox in a ‘dumbed down’ self-hosting distribution on a single server, or maybe installing a package and just having it run, or maybe having to run a podman or docker command for some. But if they are struggling with complicated networking and scaling across a set of systems, then they are going way beyond what makes sense for a self host scenario.

Based on what I’ve seen, I’d also say a homelab is often needlessly complex compared to what I’d consider a sane approach to self hosting. You’ll throw all sorts of complexity to imitate the complexity of things you are asked to do professionally, that are either actually bad, but have hype/marketing, or may bring value, but only at scales beyond a household’s hosting needs and far simpler setups will suffice that are nearly 0 touch day to day.

Every time I try, I get no. AI overview for the memed query, despite getting them for others.

I’m assuming Google is being very aggressive is disabling AI overview for well known embarrassing results as they get widely known.

if you can afford kids or not.

To amend that, if you are responsible and think you can’t afford kids and have the restraint and planning to select not to have children… there are plenty of people that can’t afford as many children as they have.

In fact of those that can “afford” kids easily, they are still more likely to stay at one or two.

Exactly, even if 7 billion people died, well there’s still a billion people. If 99% of people died, well there are still millions.

But that if that “idiot” does propagate, but so does everyone else, no skin off the species back. If the selective pressure returns, well then the others keep going.

Well, they could co-opt our brains in various ways.

That asinine stuff at an office? Maybe it’s work the computers weren’t good at.

Doing manual labor? Maybe it’s controlling some robot doing a real world analog.

Some unskippable ad that you passively thought about? Maybe it represented work being done.

Maybe it is intruding on “spare” brainpower and if the balance glitches in some weird way? Reset you with “just a dream”.

I think there’s enough room for a “wetware” computing explanation. However I could see it being more than audiences were really prepared to think through. I think your “we need the humans safely out of the way of harming us, but we don’t hate them and we’ll keep them alive and engaged in a safe way” probably would have worked well, but they wanted the AIs to be cartoonishly bad in the first movie, and that would have been “too nice”.

Yeah, there were a few people who knew better that were telling everyone, but no one listened and everyone in the world was lining up to kids his ass. Putting him in various popular movies and shows as the greatest luminary of our time. While people who knew him were writing credible reports that he is just a very lucky douche who is also a giant megalomanic.

Can’t imagine being his first wife and having her experiences and sharing those experiences and the world seeming to gaslight her that he’s actually a brilliant flawless man.

Note that the lawsuit didn’t “determine”, it was settled out of court, so there was no determination of fact.

Instead the parties agreed to let Musk call himself a founder for undisclosed terms. Musk basically paid for people to let him use that title as part of the settlement.

Perhaps, but the point stands that the specific thing called “Tesla” was founded by these guys, and Musk went through quite some headaches to be retconned as a founder of that thing, so it’s on point to drive it home that he wasn’t even that.

Fair point that “Tesla” isn’t really the great brains behind the original core tech, but that’s not the feather in the cap that Musk was going for, so it’s a bit moot toward the end of undermining his status of “founder” of Tesla.

Number of ads does not necessarily scale linearly to amount of income. If the ads alienate viewers, then they become worth less. I know I personally watch less when they started sometimes subjecting me to 30 seconds of unskippable ads to watch a 90 second video. Recently, I hit “skip ad” and it took me to another ad, which made me less likely. The other day whole watching a video someone told me to watch, I paused to look at some text. After a few moments it started rolling an ad while I was trying to read the text. The more this happens, the less likely I am to watch. Wild be interesting to know statistics on viewership versus more obnoxious ad behavior, but there’s likely at least some decline in per ad avenue versus number of ads crammed in the face of viewers.

Back when I was in school, it was a few single story buildings and then a trailer park of more classrooms.