There doesn’t even need to be penetration involved and it can still be a good time.
that’s true; but the pic implies a “gangbang” which is usually penetrative.
There doesn’t even need to be penetration involved and it can still be a good time.
that’s true; but the pic implies a “gangbang” which is usually penetrative.
i forgot strapons existed and i think that would enable a greater variety of double/triple/whatever penetration videos than gay porn currently does.
based on the strapon usage i’ve seen: i suspect people who use strapons derive more psychological pleasure than physical pleasure and if that would have an impact on the quality of the porn.
yes please! lol
but i wonder how this would work with men and women; do they take turns with the man? if so how is it different than 1-on-1 porn?
the same thing i did when even biden, et al. voted against gay marriage; gays in the military; supported gay ban in the federal gov’t and stayed silent on a slew of anti-immigrant & anti-abortion state laws.
That’s the best thing about the stuff that the CIA has done: they publicly admit to it in writing and people still refuse to believe it’s true
yes but reddit always sheds users every once and a while
getting a challenge to your world views can be healthy; i hope you enjoy your echo chamber
I don’t know about Canada; but over here you only get those questions if they deem you a high risk group and; depending on your responses; if they think you’re gay and had sex in the last year, you’re not allowed to donate.
It sounds like Canada is only okay w gays donating blood if they’re in a heteronormative couple, which; I’m willing to bet; is as a depressingly tiny minority of gay men like it is in the United States.
Sometimes, the smart prejudice is subtle or hidden in the details so that it’s more palatable to the rest and/or to confuse those who don’t like too closely.
no because i’m banned from donating blood as an american gay man with a (barely) active sex life
It feels like the powers that be have perfected the art of setting a popular dialogue with movements that credibly threaten their interests, guaranteeing that they always get their way and it’s so thorough that pointing this out gets you branded as a tankie.
Even that word feels like another psyop on its own with the way leftists use it as a cudgel against each other; also guaranteeing that we will never be able to work with each other to accomplish anything of merit.
the paradox of tolerance applies to the intolerant. all leftists are tolerant people and the strawman that we use to describe a tankie is not a leftist.
the fediverse is turning into a collection of echo chambers due to this and now i’m wondering if it’s worth it to back to reddit.
love the black eye on the camera man. lol
Back to the regularly scheduled shitposting though.
aka: the silver lining in the turd sandwich of life that makes life more bearable
universal basic income (ubi).
it’s clearly a need and like other clear needs in this country (eg health insurance) it’ll continue to get ignored until it sparks some sort of revolution or our country’s owners figure out to perpetually put it off like health insurance
just happened again when attempting to subscribe to !fullmoviesonyoutube@lemm.ee
Both are true and there’s a difference between doing fine and excelling
I prefer Lemmy’s slant towards technology-related news, and polite discussion in earnest without painfully unfunny “and my axe” responses.
I used to think so also; but Red Hat’s earth shaking move to stop sharing its source w the public was a non-event in all of the fediverse instances I could find. I missed it’s since I don’t do Reddit anymore and became aware almost 2 weeks after the fact when my employer released a statement condemning it.
it’s happened so many times it feels like the norm so i can’t remember; but it’s bound to happen again and now that i know it’s not meant to work this way i can come back and update when it happens again.
that’s why it makes more sense to have them be naked to begin with ;)