Communist

None of that applies here, can you give a specific method?

Since bluesky is mit licensed, what’s to stop a fork if something goes wrong?

what’s to stop a activitypub and atproto compatibility?

Bluesky is federated

Bluesky is federated and mit licensed

i’ve watched all of them, actually, the problem is how easy it is to puncture the display with sand.

deeper grooves at a level 3 just won’t ever do for me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt5tCAIvn2w this ain’t it.

I watch jerryrig everything haha, they do not yet meet my standards

It’s not ready for me until it’s durable

If they figure out durable scratch resistant creaseless foldables, it’s actually over for form factor changes

it is factually just different brand-name.

Everything in china goes through the chinese censors, nobody is saying that china isn’t heavily censored, but that’s tiktok and it’s available in china. Who cares about the name? So many things have different names by country.

It’s owned by the same company and is the same app with a different name…

tiktok just has a different name in china…

That’s not true either…

tiktok is completely allowed in china

it’s called douyin and is the same thing owned by the same company

Source: dude just trust me

TikTok is not banned in china.

No, the reason religion is excluded is because delusions aren’t supposed to reflect cultural conditioning. Delusions are, by their very definition, an abnormal brain process. Cultural beliefs are not abnormal brain processes, no matter how irrational they are.

That’s what i’m saying, the reason that cultural beliefs aren’t allowed to be delusions is simply because they don’t want to make religion a delusion. It’s common, so, it’s not a delusion. That’s the end of the reasoning. Should we really say that anything that’s commonly believed isn’t a delusion? I think that’s an exception made for a logical reason, it defends the field of psychology from culture, but cultures can share delusions.

Please understand that this exception is accepted by the entire field of psychology. If you disagree with it, you have 200 years of psychological debate and study to contend with. Don’t pretend you’ve read enough to claim you have grounds to disagree with something the entire field of psychology considers a settled issue. No matter how much you wish religion is a mental illness, it’s not. Sadly, the irrationality of religion is fully explainable within the bounds of normal human psychology.

The reason this exception exists is precisely as i’ve said, they’ve special cased it because they don’t want to define religion/cultural beliefs as mental illnesses. The very reason for this exception is because they don’t want it to count, not because it doesn’t meet every single other (much more important might I add) criteria.

they’re essentially going “yeah, these are delusions, but uh, enough people believe them and we don’t want to piss them off so here’s an exception”

I personally don’t think that’s valid at all, but I can see why they’d do it.

Just because a delusion is normal to have, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be a delusion.

that’s just them special casing it so that they can avoid calling it a mental illness.

It’s a persistent delusion fed to you by your parents, your parents feeding you it doesn’t change that it’s a delusion.

If someone raised their children to believe the tooth fairy was real and that everyone was going to lie and say that it wasn’t and that you have to believe anyway, that’d be a delusion, but religion is special because…? the only difference is that more people are doing it.

The only reason for the cultural exclusion is because they don’t want to define religion as a delusion, not because it isn’t one. It meets EVERY single other criteria.

That doesn’t make it worthy of respect, the same used to be said of eugenics

Belief without evidence

Persistent delusions are actually a mental illness

Belief in things without proof is called delusion, expecting people to respect those delusions is called religion

It’s banned in china