You replied to the wrong person
You replied to the wrong person
Have you passed their captive portal before turning on the VPN?
Every Lemmy instance can see which other fediverse instances they’re connected to, I’d be satisfied if it scoped to those instance domains. It’s going to be very rare to have a link to a Lemmy/kbin/whatever instance that is not already being followed by one local user, and when it does happen, the first time any local user follows it, it’s fixed again. That covers the 99% of cases better than having to educate every user every time in every thread they innocently post a normal url instead of knowing how to even copy this special url from.
Which, let’s face it, is dumb. Other clients should be able to recognize linked Lemmy instances and handle the click transparently.
Instead, now we have links that can’t be shared outside of Lemmy and links that should only be shared outside of Lemmy.
(I know you said FOSS, but) I’d try Bing Image Creator for such a small job first. It’s free, and you can just tell it to generate a logo with the style you’re looking for.
If that doesn’t suit your needs, you can always fall down the rabbithole of selfhosting Stable Diffusion, but it’s probably more effort than it’s worth.
Wonder if the recent antitrust ruling about Google paying for being the default search engine will affect Mozilla’s funding.
Just men?
Despite what others have mentioned, running a different LLM locally, it’s also possible to get ChatGPT to do this sort of stuff by telling it to participate in a “debate exercise” and giving it its talking points.
Wonder why they wouldn’t use OSM.
At least one per week, in various ways. Websites that no longer exist, obscure media I want to study… It’s great!
That is patently false. It was developed to help develop the Linux kernel, which famously has multiple decentralized repositories managed by different maintainers.
The fact that most companies use it in a way you describe, with only one central repository, does not mean that git is not distributed.
It’s alright. I use both their desktop backup service and B2 extensively. Their desktop client and web interface is very basic and a bit rough, you don’t buy their service for the well-developed UI. The service works as advertised though.
No it’s not, what a weird take. If I publish my art online for enthusiasts to see it’s not automatically licensed to everyone to distribute. If I specifically want to forbid entities I have huge ethical issues with (such as Google, OpenAI et. al.) from scraping and transforming my work, I should be able to.
Depends on why you want to hide your server ip, what’s your use case? Is it to protect against DDOS?
Cloudflare is evil, but is there any other party you would trust to share everything with?
Don’t worry, it’s fine, there’s nothing inherently wrong with running stateful workload in a container.
You should really back that up with arguments as I don’t think a lot of people would agree with you.
More tables though.
Of course it will, cloudflare is in front of it, they can definitely handje this traffic as long as itsfoss bothers to set correct caching headers for cloudflare to use. That’s the entire point of cloudflare…
Yes, but this way demand on instances scales with user count and aliows smaller instances to exist. Otherwise an errant toot on a small instance that suddenly gets popular will instantly drag that smaller instance down.
No. People who want the benefit of self housing without worrying about hardware will rent a vps or something simpler. The hard part of hardware isn’t the purchase, it’s the maintenance.
Also, why the separate router?