It’s a reference to her using her jet likely more often than I use my car.
It’s a reference to her using her jet likely more often than I use my car.
There will always be someone unhappy, but let’s make them unhappy with mild annoyances and not serious privacy violations. I’d rather prefer the Whatsapp users to be unhappy than the Signal users. In a long run it’s doing them a favor.
/subscribe
No, keep the child processes away from him!
When you screw up so much, Stephen bloody Hawking needs to get up and calm down Einstein not to beat you up.
We can to go one step further: Muslims don’t get to systemically oppress and then complain about being systemically oppressed. I believe we are done here.
As I belong to a group outright killing which Islam considers fair game, I don’t find it particularly ironic.
I have nothing against headscarves purely as a clothing, but I have a lot against organized religion they are more often than not a part of. As it stands, it’s a symbol tightly connected with systemic oppression and countless crimes against humanity. In this regard I find the two mentioned groups quite similar. It would be nice to decouple the symbol from its current meaning, but I don’t think we have such a luxury.
You already know my answer and I know yours. I believe we can leave it at this.
There are no practical considerations to not carry around swastikas either. And yet here we are due to some terrible people claiming them as symbols of hatred. I don’t mind the shape of a swastika, I mind the ideas it conveys.
Quite so. It implies a specific religion which is quite the opposite of a neutral image. Just like a cross necklace would be. Religion has no place in a workplace.
The source got pulled off Github already.