I’ve seen that video a hundred times and it never fails to disappoint
I’ve seen that video a hundred times and it never fails to disappoint
I was on a highway doing around 60 when the car in front of me suddenly spun around in a 360 and stopped. Luckily they were some distance in front and there was no other traffic. When I passed, it was a teenage boy in the passenger and his grandmother driving. She was yelling at him and reaching down between them trying to do something. I think he had pulled the e-brake just to see what would happen.
This is like famous quotes on Norm MacDonald Live as read by Gilbert Gottfried
And when you go to war they’re obligated to go too, possibly even in your place
Check your ballcock.
(It’s a real part inside the toilet but probably isn’t the issue, I just wanted to say ballcock)
Put a little dirt under your pillow for the Dirt Man
If the owner improves the home and the appraisal goes up, wouldn’t rent go up?
The renter pays extra and receives part ownership. So the owner receives this extra money and… just has to keep the money on hand in case the renter leaves years down the road?
The whole thing is a legal nightmare. Owners would just sell. And who would buy? Corporate landlords who have lawyers who can cut through all this confusion.
I like to think the road leading into the cul-de-sac is accurate in size and his paths varied by about three road-widths and he was running through people’s yards at times.
(The truth is probably that the app doesn’t draw over previous paths so 450 laps equals 450 lines side-by-side)
The weiling fan is decoration enough
That’s not what really happened though. They needed an investor to get the company off the ground. Musk came in and screwed them out of the company
It’s not on the list but I always wanted to be a knocker-upper
Ok I think I get where you’re coming from. It’s membership in the nation group that makes it genocide. But that would make almost all war genocide. We could think that but it kinda takes away all meaning. If all war is genocide then no war is genocide.
It also ignores the second part of the definition, “with the aim of destroying that nation or group.” That is a basic Google/dictionary definition and it’s not bad but the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide defined it as “…acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.”
First, there has to be intent. Second, “as such” means destroying the group so much that it is no longer a group.
US law isn’t applicable but it is a little more clear.
USC 1091 defines genocide as “…specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such.”
USC 1093 defines the term “substantial part” to mean: “a part of a group of such numerical significance that the destruction or loss of that part would cause the destruction of the group as a viable entity within the nation of which such group is a part.”
I believe they’re both saying “destroy the group so hard it is no longer a viable group.”
If nation group is the gauge, the question is: During WWII, did the US intend to destroy Germans so thoroughly that there was no longer a Germany? Did the US intend to destroy Iraqis so thoroughly that there ceased to be an entity called Iraq?
No to both of those.
Ba’athists aren’t a nation or ethnic group either.
No not really. Just because we can put the enemy into a group doesn’t make it genocide. Every war is fought against an enemy we can put into a group. The Germans in WWII were Christians. We weren’t committing genocide against Christians.
The goal in Iraq was to change the people in power. We didn’t target Ba’athists, we targeted those in power who happened to be Ba’athists. And if you recall, we did that in like 3 weeks and thought we were done. We didn’t go around rounding up Ba’athists trying to eradicate them. We got them out of power and said “mission accomplished!”
Then it turns out a lot of people, Ba’athist and non-Ba’athist, didn’t like us being there and it became a huge messy “us vs everybody.”
At least they didn’t try that with toilet paper
I keep plenty of scrap parts and supplies but the only “garbage” I tend to hang on to is large foam padding. I have one that I land the end of my kayak on when I’m getting it off my vehicle roof, one that’s big enough to lay on when I’m working under a car and one that I put under heavy parts when working on the workbench. I have a small stack that I will throw away when I realize I’ll never use them then slowly rebuild when I see one and think “I’ll use that for something.”
I work in an industry that uses razor blades and if OSHA comes in and finds one laying around it’s an automatic fine ($500 last I heard but that was a decade ago). They make disposable jugs for used blades, we put the blades in and throw the jug away once it’s full. So, basically, the same as your method. It seems to be the best anyone’s came up with.
I posted this on Mastodon. In case you believe"alpha males" are smart, there is a bodybuilders forum that argued for page after page about how many days there are in a week.
https://youtu.be/eECjjLNAOd4?si=Lf-fcuVnT4IWzKNB