I’ve seen the author on political shows in the UK. She’s the worst kind of right wing hack and her opinions are worthless.

I’m sure there are more than a few edge lords just shitposting away. I’d guess there are others who haven’t bothered to think through the implications for the future of democracy in the US that an assassination would bring about.

I don’t fucking trust the left.

This is so reductive as to be completely meaningless.

The media and social media are geared towards reinforcing tribalism. You have to pick a team and anyone on the other team is your enemy. It works well as a means of driving engagement and making money at the expense of having an electorate that is informed.

It reminds me of the town hall Bernie Sanders did on Fox News a few years ago. If you strip away the partisan blinkers and have a debate based on facts, specific policy points, and focusing on trying to improve people’s lives instead of scoring cheap points then more people agree than disagree, regardless of political affiliation.

I guess the question is, “who benefits from a divided electorate?”

“Sorry, I’m not going to have a battle of wits with someone who is clearly unarmed.”

A Moka pot, it’s the best coffee I’ve tasted, I’ll never go back to using those coffee machines with the basket and the glass carafe.

Also, a really good chef’s knife, kept really sharp. I use a couple of Global ones.

Luna moth?

The best music sounded better, I’m not a fan of the harsh, over compressed and brick wall limited digital stuff these days. It’s tiring to listen to.

You’re missing out.

It’s not an easy watch but it’s worth it, unlike some of the other movies mentioned here the shock factor is necessary to tell the story and it’s a story worth experiencing.

Great movie though, I should watch it again.

I haven’t seen anyone mention Come and See yet, so that one.

Citation needed.

Watch out, some dickhead might accuse you of sealioning.

I don’t need to reread what you wrote

Cool. We’re done here.

So which part do you know to be false,

Re-read what I wrote, I was quite clear although I edited my post a minute after submitting so maybe you missed it.

You can claim I’m seasoning all you want, anyone with a functioning brain can see I’m not.

Asking for a source just to ask for a source is called sealioning.

Good grief, no.

I read so much absolute bullshit around nuclear and renewables where people just write out their feelings on the subject. Asking for sources to back up their claims isn’t sealioning, it’s a polite way of asking someone to try and back up their claims with facts.

Thanks for this. I did ask OP for sources, in other words links to verifiable data to back up the assertion that:

“Has anyone who wants to “go green” without nuclear ever looked at the power output of these things?? It’s not even the same league! AaagggghHhHhhhhhhhh”

Please provide valid sources to back up your comment. Thanks.

The alternative is to be making bank on a far smaller outlay much more quickly with renewables.

👍

Its not cheaper if you only count the generation side you are ignoring Storage and Capacity factor those in and its not cheaper anymore.

Cost per kW:

Nuclear: $6,695–7,547

Solar PV with storage: $1,748

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

You ran for the hills when I called out your mistruths earlier. You’re still lying.

Here’s more:

"Roughly speaking, the total cost of these solar-plus-storage facilities would be:

$8.4 billion for 10.55 GWdc of solar power, fully installed at 80¢/watt

$527 million for hypothetical power grid upgrades at 5¢/Watt

$7.8 billion for 39.3 GWh of energy storage fully installed at $200/kWh

Around $16.8 billion grand total, no incentives

So, Georgia, pv magazine USA just saved you more than $13 billion (as of today anyway)."

https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2021/08/05/youve-got-30-billion-to-spend-and-a-climate-crisis-nuclear-or-solar/