Hildegarde

It says (parody) in the name.

This is twitter, because elon lacks reading comprehension, so the rules require parody to be clearly marked.

The piano for when dodecaphony doesn’t subvert tonality nearly enough.

No iron clothes is a lie. They say no iron on the label in the store, but they tell you to iron in on the care label.

That’s clearly two beads high fiving

What is the timeframe in the contract? The quotes only show a tiny excerpt of the whole contract.

I don’t see anything unreasonable about this if the terms expire when the game releases or the review embargo lifts. Reviewers can’t review pre-release copies of games until the embargo lifts.

If the non disparagement clause remains in effect after release, that’s very bad. Impossible to tell which it is from the tiny excerpt provided.

I still don’t know what a preposition even is. What are they even for?

“Do not blindly trust quotes from the internet” -Aristotle

A lack of engagement is a solvable problem. Become the engagement you want to see.

no u

I’m pretty sure this is canada, unless this has become an international trend in record time.

To be fair, we’re not the only one.

I’m sure glad I didn’t pick coke. EWWWWWW

ok… 2

I don’t wanna. (＃`Д´)

no u

Some monitors or TVs have a split screen function built in. There’s probably a box too somewhere.

Cheeseburgers are named after the German city of Cheeseburg.

If you look at this from an entirely cynical lens, backing Kojima is the sensible choice. Kojima wasn’t leaving the industry. He would have a high level, influential job wherever he ended up.

At the same time, Konami was publicly backing out of the games industry. Konami is a multimedia company with many divisions. Their casinos are far more profitable than their games, so they were making major cuts to their gaming division.

Backing the major industry figure against the company that doesn’t want to make games anymore is what anyone running a show like the game awards would optimally do. That’s why you shouldn’t consider it a principled stance.

Keighly has a history of working in games media to publicise games. He was never an investigative reporter publishing things the industry didn’t want talked about. If you read his writing from before starting the game awards, it was like most gaming media, little more than third party advertising for upcoming games.

The thing with Kojima wasn’t some principled stance against injustice. He gave the award he was scheduled despite konami’s decision. That’s showbusiness. The awards are the result of a vote. Had konami allowed Kojima to attend, he wouldn’t have mentioned the firing.

Many asked Keighly to mention the layoffs at his show. Those familiar with his work knew not to expect it. The show is funded by games publishers. Calling out one publisher is fine in some circumstances. Calling out the industry as a whole is a good way to make this show your last.

What am I looking at? Should I conclude that Cybertruck is a bad off-road vehicle, or that sand is an unsuitable surface for driving, or both?