Thanks for answering! I was afraid it would be taken as sarcasm but I genuinely wanted to know.

If you were to give an estimate: How many of the people fundamentally disagreeing with you online are rational and honest people, and how many are US federal agents or in their employ? Percentage-wise.

It’s like a strawman made from artificial grass.

It’s a shit voting system. But the election is happening. How to effect a mass general strike large enough to change the voting system and introduce a new candidate with a chance of winning within two months?

Because that is needed in order to safely tell people not to vote.

In real, actionable, practical terms: What is the alternative you propose people choose, that will reduce the likelyhood of a fascist government right now at this election?

That is a valid question in isolation, but bringing it up in discussions on where to vote is not leading to discussions or actionable improvements. It only functions to push voter disenfrachisement.

Not saying it’s your intention, but it is your effect.

Voting least bad is important. Don’t discourage it.

Working for better voting options is also important. Do push for that too, but find a constructive setting for it.

My new political platform will be like Fascism but built on demonizing the dead instead of living minorities. They are easy targets. Buncha freeloaders.

Seeing the… type… of people who can’t handle fact checking, I am relieved it is in place.

Behold, I will immediately misrepresent what you said

Yeah imagine doing that

👋 samesies!

You may or may not be making a valid point, but you need to be clearer about who you are referring to and in which context.

Look at the modlog, you’ll see a pattern in how the mods deal with discsussions around this guy.

Going to war isn’t fascism. Fascism is not a label that means “I think they did something wrong”.

Not showing up for me. Illegal in Europe or something?

Strychnine tea. At least you know what it’ll to your body.

https://www.eldercactus.com/personal-computer/

One of them was my current employer when I was arguing about not managing to keep people on my team.

And I said exactly that, except didn’t walk out naturally. In another frustrated discussion I almost yelled “You can’t CHOOSE not to compete with them!”

True. But also I get paid more by taking my employment elsewhere. So win?win? I guess.

A capitalist company with a CEO earning what CEOs earn, and a board of directors maximizing profit, does not get to shame me for wanting to get paid as much as I can.

-We offer a competitive salary.

-Places X, Y and Z offer much more.

-We don’t compete with them.

Stupidly enough - not satire. I’ve had this conversation with three different companies. They struggle to attract talent for some weird reason.