Dovahkiin, is that you?

No worries then, it’s algorithm-based, not religion-based (I am agnostic).

That’s a bit oddly specific, this wasn’t intended to be about that, but alright. I’m not one of them but know enough people who are to know she goes overboard with her criticisms sometimes. For example, she singles certain people out for their “treasure hunting” when it was a folk tradition practiced by many people at the time, misconstrues their dress code on more than one occasion, and paints Joseph Smith’s expression of polygamy as dirty when, if it was as dirty as people say, it would’ve been one of the crimes he was charged with by the courts. I singled her out because she’s the easiest person to get stuck seeing on the front page, so it quite literally and unavoidably feels in your face, thus it’s a bit of a meme right now to cite her.

I feel like this comment of yours is a jab against me, but Leah Remini herself, after being asked to weigh in on Mormonism, said it’s nowhere near as bad as people paint it, so I at least have the OG to help back things up.

Oh would you look at that, they did steal the footage I showed, just as I predicted.

Partially but not entirely.

That’s 100% what I mean. I didn’t have the right words for it though.

Yeah, same thing as here.

deleted by creator

Refresh me on that, what happened?

Enabling as in justifying something that normally cannot be justified.

It’s a sequel to a previous question. I’ve been watching people bombard someone I met with claims that she must be a narcissist/schizophrenic/whatever based on trivial disagreements and them thinking she thinks she’s always right (despite the people saying that being in a very specific demographic), and in turn other people saying she comes off as thinking she’s always right as an immune response to people gaslighting her in the first place. She posted a few demonstration videos on Tiktok which one of the supposed gaslighters then decided to infringe the copyright on and post on YT saying it makes them look good (ironically the “gaslighter” is coordinated with another infamous guy who has pushed the same agenda). And here I am trying to find a way to ask “wtf is this” but can’t because the AITA groups either don’t allow people saying things on others’ behalf or don’t allow the video format. At this moment there’s a new video from her that hasn’t been deleted yet (she deletes the ones that are copied) but which is inevitably going to be deleted when the other guy replicates it.

What kind of trick would it be?

I’m pretty sure public sector performability is objectively measurable as opposed to assholery. I’m not strictly talking about that, I mean people literally doing what their contract or job description promises.

I wasn’t wondering about that though.

That’s considered a soap opera?

Yeah, just free love.

It’s not as if, when a group gets too big, it’s not natural for sectarianism to develop.

That’s the argument though, they’re already being pit against each other, with people already fighting over who is worthy to say “I have autism”.

A few reasons.

1. The internet is taken for granted and this would be like a social cap. In theory, something could take its place in limited form in private settings.

2. The internet travels around the world through undersea cables (long enough to encircle the Earth 180 times) which then go into servers which then go into cables which then reach your residence, and that’s a lot of service strain we add onto by putting the internet wherever we can.

3. Knowledgeability isn’t as appreciated as it used to be, and having a hub for it would un-devalue it.

4. It would help maintain the right flow of interaction and information and combat things like misinformation.

5. So that people don’t pose a hassle to administration.

6. To bring people together.

7. Some countries want to ban it entirely, and it would serve as a good middle ground to pacify the urge to do this without eliminating the internet.

It’s no different in my opinion from proposing something such as us all living in communal housing.

Once upon a time, I took a Communist Manifesto out of my local library, which I later discovered was a fake, and one of the tenets called for communal hooking-up.