What a stupid reply. Expecting free help, but posting more than a logo from google is asking too much.

A bad take if I’ve ever seen one.

And how does this negate my initial point that you shouldn’t trust in the security of something just because it is open source? I think you misunderstood what I was saying.

Dont understand what that has to do with the discussion so far. How is this relevant here?

Regarding point 2. I get what you’re saying but I instantly thought of Heartbleed. Arguably one of the most used examples of open source in the world, but primarily maintained by one single guy and it took 2 years for someone to notice the flaw.

So believing something is „safe“ just because it is open source and „open to billions of people“ can be problematic.