I figure the mobile carrier was blocking incoming connections to my phone. This was a couple of years ago, things might have changed since then.
I figure the mobile carrier was blocking incoming connections to my phone. This was a couple of years ago, things might have changed since then.
Thank you
I didn’t mean prevent, just makes it harder by default. You can still open connections from within the NAT
Edit: I do admit to failing at accessing my IPv6 PC from my IPv6 phone
Edit2: apparently NAT is full of security bugs
You’re talking about NAT traversal? We do have control over which we apps we run though?
Edit: apparently NAT is full of bugs
I still have to initiate the outgoing UDP. Are you talking about the specific case where any software running on my host can initiate it without me requesting?
Edit: apparently NAT is full of security bugs
The main benefit of a NAT is that by default it prevents all external access to the hosts inside the network. Any port you have open is not accessible unless explicitly forwarded.
This has a lot of security benefits. Regardless, everything you said is sounds true to me.
Why do you say NAT doesn’t make a network more secure?
deleted by creator
Thank you
How do you actually do that?
How do you decide what to listen to? I assume you don’t listen to multiple entire discographies
I would completely reformat all affected machines. AVs are not perfect. Yes it sucks, but imagine the consequences of doing any form of banking on an infected machine.
Dave’s Garage, the man who created task manager
TIL my local library is a cult
Understood. CG-NAT has been so annoying, I would love for IPv6 to completely replace v4 ASAP