• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ive seen people link that one multiple times and i am at a loss what its about.

    The cc 4.0 license it points to does not mention AI at all.

    CC even has a page where they state that it probably is legal to train on cc protected content but it depends on context.

    https://creativecommons.org/2023/08/18/understanding-cc-licenses-and-generative-ai/

    I think someone used ai to mean attribution/alike, international. Which are part of the full name (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) but still make little sense as an acronym next to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 being the official acronym.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      i am at a loss what its about.

      The only thing worse than the tech-bro’s worshiping AI like it’s the next messiah and we all must pave way for this revolutionary technology that will only seem to benefit white Americans with disposable income, are the people on the opposite end of the spectrum who are have a hysterical hatred for LLM’s because their favorite Youtube streamers are getting clicks by ranting about how bad AI is. They are not being personally impacted by AI at all but are delusional enough to think that there will be laws and regulations and that AI will be “banned” if we all “raise awareness” and it’s about as useful as the Bud Lite protests but not even remotely as entertaining.