• explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which description? That Wikipedia article says “The aim is to provide an alternative to centralized platforms such as YouTube, Vimeo, and Dailymotion.”

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference to YouTube is that it’s not intended to create a huge platform centralizing videos from the whole world on a single server farm (which is horribly expensive).

        From their website. It’s a very different system, and also not funded by advertisers, which means someone else has to pay the bills.

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is PeerTube’s purpose to replace YouTube?

          We can answer with certainty: no!

          The ambition remains to be a free and decentralized alternative: the goal of an alternative is not to replace, but to propose something else, with different values, in parallel to what already exists.

          They’re saying they’re not a “replacement” because it’s a decentralized alternative to something centralized. Not because it can’t serve the same needs for technical or economic reasons.