bartolomeo@suppo.fi to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoAll lives rulesuppo.fiimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down16
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageAll lives rulesuppo.fibartolomeo@suppo.fi to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoLiterally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”. “Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.
minus-squareWallEx@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoMaybe for you that’s the case, I definitely have a definition of morally good and both sides aren’t that. Accepting collateral for example. You can’t be good in my book if you’re doing that, and they both did.
minus-squarebrain_in_a_box@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months ago “Good” is a subjective idea one is definitely good compared to the other. K
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoBoth are consistent within the confines of the definition.
Literally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”.
“Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.
Maybe for you that’s the case, I definitely have a definition of morally good and both sides aren’t that. Accepting collateral for example. You can’t be good in my book if you’re doing that, and they both did.
K
Both are consistent within the confines of the definition.