• pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My afternoons at 18: sips tea reading Noam Chomsky’s Failed State

    My afternoons at 30: sips vodka reading Unabomber’s Manifesto

      • BeMoreCareful@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He was preaching in his manifesto, it’s unbelievably based.

        It’d be Walden 2 Das kapital returns if it weren’t for him trying to blow up random people.

      • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ok, just a couple of guilty ones then

        Edit: oh I almost forgot

        /s

        I don’t want Secret Services rifling through my stuff because some of you don’t have the ingenuity to tell this was a joke

      • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know if 12 years qualifies as “quickly”, but it escalated for sure

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not exactly. Read the manifesto. He was incredibly based, and would have gone down as Marx’s spiritual protege if he hadn’t decided to bomb people

          • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            if he hadn’t decided to bomb people

            that’s exactly what I was referring to 😂
            But yeah, I found the book insightful for sure

    • hexi [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ted started off as a smart guy, but the MKULTRA abuse he experienced left him with a broken ideology.

      Many parts of his manifesto are problematic, and I hope people don’t think it’s good theory.

      Some excerpts:

      The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

      The leftist seeks to satisfy his feeling of inferiority by cultivating attitudes of superiority. He is not the only one to do this, but he is the one who goes furthest in this direction.

      Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good, and successful.

      The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter, a ruthless competitor. This kind of person is too eager to seize the initiative and too insensitive to feel guilty for his aggression. The leftist is as prone to manipulating others as the more right-wing person, but his main goal is to avoid straining his own conscience.

      Ted also has some jabs at reactionaries, but he’s not a leftist for sure. There’s better literature out there, from an actual leftist perspective that people could be reading instead.

      • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he committed the error of giving a political attribute to a certain cathegory of people.
        In those excerpt, if you switch “leftist” with “twitter social justice warrior” you can feel who really he is mad at.