• crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      If an organisations’ security relies on the end device configuration there is no security.

    • ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For the user or the company? Assuming the user isn’t a moron with computers?

      Edit: guess im out of the loop as a contractor who generally only does BYOD with my linux machine

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both. The company puts shit on the user’s computer and the user may not meet the company’s security standards. It’s just a bad idea.

      • Bobert@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        For the company, and no one should ever assume for a moment that everyone has their guard up at all times and is infallible.

      • Contend6248@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If a user doesn’t understand that having complete control over every device in your network is essential, he’s being a complete moron with computers.

        You should do your work, not worrying about patching all the 128 tools you think you need, that’s other peoples job.