• awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really hope you’re right. VR has a lot more long-term potential than most people realize, and if there’s a corporation in charge of it it’ll be worse

    • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This goes against the whole concept of the metaverse, in metas own words “There won’t be a Meta-run metaverse, just as there isn’t a ‘Microsoft internet’ or ‘Google internet’ today”. By definition, if one corporation is in charge, it’s not the metaverse.

      • STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s a lie. Meta wants to be in charge. They’ve just failed to take the market share because the product they made isn’t good

          • STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            the project has already failed based on the initial release of their “metaverse” VR game. and whatever future plans they may have I guarantee they will either cancel it or release something completely underwhelming.

              • STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                meta is nowhere close to their speculative implementation of the metaverse either, it’s just an attempt to build hype and keep investors interested until they forget about the whole thing in a few years

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t believe for a second that Meta would produce something open and free that they didn’t control and make money from