No matter which sort you use (except for new), content is recommended to you by activity. Depending on the sort (active, hot, top) it uses a slightly different mixture of votes/comments/time since post to determine the order.

The only exception is scaled, which boosts a little bit midsized communities, but still doesn’t manage to improve visibility of niche ones.

If lemmy is to truly start having active hobbyist communities instead of being 95% lefty US politics, Shitposts, and some tech stuff, it needs a sort that takes into account the user’s engagement.

For example, if I upvote / comment often in a community, there should be an option to have posts from the community be boosted in my feed, even if it’s a tiny community.

Let’s say I’m subscribed to !world@lemmy.world and !news@lemmy.world because I want to occasionally see news. However, I’m also subscribed to a couple hundred other communities, some of them who don’t manage to get more than a couple upvotes on their biggest posts. And whenever I see them I’m replying/upvoting because I’m passionate about that topic.

My feed shouldn’t be 95% c/news and c/world because those are the most upvoted and commented. I shouldn’t have to scroll down hundreds of posts to find “big” posts in small communities I interact with at any opportunity I get.

That’s why I think it would be beneficial to lemmy if the sort/algorithm took into account your engagement in a way.

It doesn’t have to be complicated, you can have a single number “engagement score” for every community calculated with a basic formula, and that number is used as a boost to the community.

I’m aware that there are some examples of successful niche communities on lemmy. But that’s mainly because either a significant chunk of the lemmy userbase is into that niche (let’s face it the lemmy community is not a representative sample of the world population, we tend to be very similar people), or because the posts on it are simplified image/video type posts which appeal to people who don’t know much about the subject.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    Nice. I will try it. Do I have to keep Quiblr cookies for the option to work?

    • Aurelius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      Quiblr’s For You feed should still work without cookies. Let me know if it works for you

        • Aurelius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 days ago

          Not at this time. I built the For You feed to be flexible for both signed in and not-signed in users. I can look into adding it as a feature, but it may take a while because Im working to finish the native mobile apps at the moment

          • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            cheers.

            IMO would be a cool feature.

            Because I often get posts I don’t have a clue about because I’m not subscribed to that community, take like 15 secs to understand what the hell is on my screen, and then the for you algorithm starts pushing that community even more because I stayed on it a while.

            • Aurelius@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 days ago

              Ahh I see. If that happens in the future, you can also click the 3 dots on the post and press “Show Less”. It will add more weight so it rise up in the For You feed