• ᵀʰᵉʳᵃᵖʸᴳᵃʳʸ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    11·
    5 hours ago

    “smarts”, I guess you gave up on that Grammer Nazi shit huh?

    “Smarts” is a colloquialism

    Yep, you know my life history and personality based on 7 comments

    Exactly

    And yet you can’t explain your shitty idealism

    You never asked

    everyone else is wrong and you’re the king of earth.

    Finally someone gets it

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      1·
      4 hours ago

      It’s bad Grammer and highly regionalized at that.

      So a douche and an anarchist, who could have guessed that combination.

      I did.

      We got the douche part already, lets take it back a notch before you cut yourself with all that edge.

      • ᵀʰᵉʳᵃᵖʸᴳᵃʳʸ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        11·
        4 hours ago

        Okie dokie

        I’m mostly only a douche to fascists and conservatives and capitalists and liberals and people I disagree with on small things

        Not to me you didn’t. I went back up the chain and I see you kind of half asked someone else, but not me

        Me IRL: 1000006214

              • ᵀʰᵉʳᵃᵖʸᴳᵃʳʸ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                11·
                2 hours ago

                Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  1·
                  1 hour ago

                  Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

                  Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

                  If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

                  • ᵀʰᵉʳᵃᵖʸᴳᵃʳʸ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    1·
                    1 hour ago

                    Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

                    You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?

                    you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

                    Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense

                    If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

                    Lol