• blunderworld@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well then what’s the issue? Because every complaint I’ve seen so far has been about the optional monetary facet.

      • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think people are complaining about ads because ads imply tracking. I don’t know, I use Jerboa because I value the four freedoms, I’m not out here protesting non-free apps because the free apps work well enough for me.

        • blunderworld@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          AFAIK the way ad revenue works is dependent on trackers. Paying to remove ads on Sync also removes all trackers according to many people who have tested it; still seems to come down to not wanting to pay the developer.

          Which is fine, of course. I just think framing the app as sketchy or something is completely misguided.

          • 30p87@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are Sync Free and Sync Paid Edition separate apps? Because if not, you still have some ad publishers framework on your phone and running. I’d guess it’s Google, which means play services are required. That’s a big no-go for degoogled Linux users.

            • napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The dev said that the framework is completely disabled once you purchase the ad-free version. Various people also confirmed that statement with anti-tracking software.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I suspect you’d hear a lot fewer complaints about paying the developer if the software were open source

            People willingly donate to FOSS projects all the time. Hell, some devs even have a problem with people constantly wanting to donate when they explicitly can’t/won’t accept donations

            • TehPers@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Donations don’t generate nearly as much money as purchases. I like open source just as much as the next person, but there’s no way that I could afford to drop my job and go full time into an open source project. Looking at Lemmy’s donations for example, the annual budget on OpenCollective is, at this time, ~$10k (which is significantly below US minimum wage at least), and their Patreon link shows $1650/mo. It’s a nice chunk of cash, but not sustainable.

              One approach I’ve really liked is what Aseprite does. You can buy the precompiled product, or you can clone the repository and build it yourself. Most users won’t build it, so they get paid and still get to share the code with the community.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok? But this is a completely different tangent. I was replying to a person who was claiming the primary reason that people dislike sync is that they don’t want the dev to get paid, when clearly that is not the case.