• _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    For each project there is one authoritative instance, one “server” that everyone pushes to. Otherwise you get chaos.

    • Asyx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not a git thing though. You can totally have multiple remotes and the remotes are just git repositories themselves. Git is 100% decentralized. There is technically nothing stopping you from having multiple remotes.

    • perishthethought@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That may be how you use it, but that’s not baked into git. See my previous response. There’s a bunch of FUD in this thread for some reason.

      • Thann@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        People want simple answers, and “blockchain bad” seems to satisfy many

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      And nobody ever forked a project, and lived happily ever after, then end.

      • _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you want to work with the original project, you have to push to the server that controls the original project.

        • Thann@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          No you don’t, you can just fork it, add a commit, and walk away, and everyone can decide which one they want to clone