I can tell a lot about a source’s bias by the question(s) they state and the answer they claim to have.
Does the answer they give match the question?
Does the question even have a relevant/importantly relevant answer, or is it unknowable to the point of lacking usefullness?
Some people would be shocked to realize just how much crap gets caught by those two things, for me at least. Obviously Fox [or really insert your least favorite source] isnt publishing 100% truths, but sources that myself and those with similar ideals seem to more frequently trust, publish crap articles pretty frequently too.
You’re describing the entire Democratic party. Remember who illegally voted to end the railstrike because “oh no christmas”?
To what degree and by.what pressures varies significantly, but she isn’t president yet. I’d sure like to find out, rather than get another 4 of less-than-average-length Donald.